The high level climate talk that just ended in Koenigswinter, West Germany yesterday was hailed as an ice-breaking event. I wonder what was the carbon footprints this event generated to just "break the ice", supposed to pave a way to Cancun talk in November.

This, however, is a necessary step to ensure that UN climate talk remains on track, and continued to be supported. To recapture the failures in Copenhagen, again, among the complexity of emerging item agendas and "the building block approach" devised in Copenhagen, I see at least four major stumbling blocks that would have to be overcome for a successful negotiation:

Marwaan Macan-Markar interviews NICOLA BULLARD, member of the World Social Forum's international council

BANGKOK, Jan 13, 2010 (IPS) - Ten years after its founding, the World Social Forum (WSF) has come to represent a rallying point for activists and grassroots groups committed to shaping an alternative world view.

"It is very important that we have this space for all of us to come together and shape a vision that reflects our concerns," says Nicola Bullard, a senior associate of Focus on the Global South, a Bangkok-based think tank championing issues that matter to people in the developing world. "We have been able to build our own discourse, our own thinking, our own legitimacy."

On the eve of the most important climate change negotiations to take place to date, it's unfortunate that the upcoming proceedings in Copenhagen will be overshadowed by yet another attack on the science that has overwhelming shown that the Earth is warming, and it's our fault.

In case you've not heard, Climategate has taken hold of the blogosphere over the past two weeks. Someone apparently hacked the UK-based Climate Research Unit's email servers and found that a number of the world's more prominent climate scientists have been less then forthright in sharing data that might be contrary to the abundance of evidence that we're making the world hotter.

A.T. Biopower is just one of many small power plants to come on line in the past decade as Thailand follows the global trend to reduce its reliance on fossil fuels. The country's current goal is to generate 20% of the nation's electricity from renewable sources by 2022, a target similar to those set by the EU, UK and Australia.

Bhorn says she's unfamiliar with new energy polices but has become increasingly familiar with environmental changes occurring in her neighborhood since the A.T. Biopower plant came on line in 2005. Her Hor Krai community is not alone. Problems and concerns over social and environmental impacts from biomass power plants have become commonplace over the past few years. Supakij Nantaworakarn, a renewable energy researcher with the Healthy Public Policy Foundation, estimates that protests against biomass projects have been widespread, occurring in at least 20 Thai provinces, many of which are on going.

Thailand might be mistaken for a committed climate change combatant if the only metric is its aggressive promotion of carbon credits' generation from the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM). Since the country's ratification of the Kyoto Protocol in 2002, CDM development represents Thailand's only tangible response to climate change: nearly one hundred CDM projects entering the project pipeline since 2005. However, a new report released today by Thaiclmate's Nantiya Tangwisutijit reveals that a survey of some of the more widely publicized CDM projects in Thailand reveal that they neither comply with the intentions of CDM as prescribed in the Kyoto Protocol, and may actually causing public health problems and disruption of communities.